Sunday, January 1, 2012

Declaring 2012 the year of truth with two new articles

Please see the new article from Dr. John Wyndham at the Journal of 9/11 Studies. It's entitled "The Pentagon Attack: Problems with Theories Alternative to Large Plane Impact." If the past is any indication, there should be plenty of feedback. Here is the abstract (and please excuse our home page because the site is under reconstruction):

The widespread belief among those who question the official account of 9/11, that a large plane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11, is unsupported by the evidence. The failure of the 9/11 truth movement to reach consensus on this issue after almost a decade is largely due to a failure to rigorously apply the scientific method to each proposed theory. This paper, by so applying the evidence to each proposed theory, shows that a large plane hitting the Pentagon is by far the most plausible theory.

Additionally, here is a new blog entry from yours truly, entitled "The small world of 9/11 players: LS2, Vidient and AMEC."
Happy new year!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.